As I see, the problem is not if there exists equality or not, the problem is what you do with the diference. I think that in bioethical or just ethical terms we must consider all humans equal without having in consideration what makes us different to another. Pointing unequallity sometimes leads to put "the unequal" on a lower human status and this is dangerous, relays on a false premise, and leads to dystopia.
Discussion
Preventing one race from ruling over another is a worthy goal. Ending centralized empires and instituting kinship-based states solves this problem. For those too deeply infected with the multiracialist mind-virus, I suspect there will always be some multiracial states.
I don't get what a "kinship-based state" is exactly, sorry.
For me the first goal is to stop talking about what makes us diferents and point at our common interests that we have a lot as specie the first and more important, avoid our extinction.
Ending all kind of empire is a good thing, always.
People naturally want to live with people who are of the same or similar background. Ancient Greece, for example, was a kinship-based state. To a large extent, Japan is one today. Kinship-based states are the kind of states that people naturally make when men with guns don't stop them.
So when your theory would be right. Why do people travel and move to different places to live?
People move for many different reasons. There is conquest. There is infiltration. There is takeover. There is crass materialism (I want more money!). There is escape from tyranny. But, whatever the reason, it is better for all peoples to maintain their racial integrity.
Why? The last sentence here does not have any relation with the first part of your argument.
People moves because we are all more or less free to decide what we want to do with our lifes. And no one is good or bad from where one is born. Being born here or there is pure contingency and does not define nothing, as I see. Every human has the right to not want to life where one is born. I don't see the problem here.
You talk about immigration in very bad terms, but I'm sure that your ancestors, at some point, moved. And maybe you or your ancestors participated in diluting some other culture that was there before. For example, whites americans tend to reclaim american nation as something that bellngs to europeans descendants, but they where, at some point, immigrants that took over natives there (cherokees...) and they, at the same time did the same... And the wheel keeps wheeling
To answer your question: It is better for people to maintain their racial integrity because 1) there is great value in what Nature has created over tens of millennia (and there is great evil in destroying it), and 2) because panmixia is anti-evolution.
Panmixia (funny term) is something that has always existed. You don't have the colour of skin that you have because from the begining of times on cluster of white people decided to not mix with others, evolution and mixing leaded to your phenotypia. So I thing you are confusing terms to get your point.
The value is not in maintaining whatever kimera you made about race, the value is to maintain humanity that is the hability to understand between all humans and to be empathic... Well, probably you disagree with me
The first step in realistic kindness and real empathy is to recognize reality. And working to eradicate, or allowing the eradication of, existing races by mixing them is definitely not kindness.
I could put it another way, too. If you live in a place in which you are more or less guaranteed to have great-grandchildren of your own race -- then you live in a true nation. On the other hand, if you live a place where this is far from certain, then you have been conquered and live as a subject in an empire.
I absolutely disagree. "One reace" nations are something of the past you like it or not. On the other hand, culture and tradition is something permeable that can be adopted by whoever human that decides to live on wherever wants. When people moves, maintains certain traditions from where they come and also adopts some of the place where they go. This, with the proper amount of time, creates culture. And nations are most culture than skin colour. I supouse that we can agree that french and english people are two different nations (to point some), and the "race" is the same. Or normand people that might consider themselves a nation and in "race" terms they are exactly like bretons, frenchs o netherlanders.
They may indeed do all those things that you say. But the facts remain: Forced multiracialism is genocide. And voluntary multiracialism is suicide.
I should add that monoracial nations are definitely not something only of the past. Ideologies (most of them harmful or insane or both) come and go. Evolution (and the race-creation it entails) is eternal. Nature and evolution cannot be suppressed forever.
The long-term trend is that the races are becoming _more different_ as time passes. A blip in the other direction caused by Christianity and liberalism cannot change that for long.
I'm sorry for you but long term temds to crate more equal humans and diluting races. Unless you force people to dtay where they born and ban them to procreate "in a multiracial way". You only can do that using violence in any sense
No, you're totally wrong about that. Most people, when left alone, tend to form kinship-based (that is, race-based) societies -- unless men with guns stop them. The fact that there are exceptions to this does not invalidate the premise, and the descendants of any mixed population eventually feel themselves to be a race and act according to Nature anyway.
Here's how you see the _really_ long term trend I am talking about (and this applies not only to humans, but to other creatures too): Once upon a time, many many millennia ago, all existing human races had a common ancestor. There were no racial differences between them then. But, since then, many, many differences have developed. They have racially diverged. This is how new species are eventually born. Evolution cannot take place without this process.
I think any reader canlsee the obvious and does not follow ideology of racism. Please send me a message when you start reading about facts and stop your dogmatic views. Thanks