It’s not the mining that’s a problem. It seems they’re just reselling the same hashes. The problem is that they shouldn’t have power to validate bitcoin transactions. That power is reserved to bitcoin nodes.

Don’t have a problem with federations either. Federations are fine, whether Liquid or RSK. The chain validators are outside the bitcoin ecosystem. No forks necessary. Something happens to that chain, it’s not a problem with bitcoin.

You might see it as a fuzzy, but I see one as inside bitcoin and the other as outside bitcoin.

Honestly, I don’t understand why DC proponents don’t just create their own federation. It just needs to be separate from bitcoin.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Do you know how difficult it is to create a federation, find willing volunteers, start a company and raise money to pay for security cryptography experts to constantly be online 24/7 to ensure nobody ever tries to steal funds?

DC proponents are pro mining, fanatics about economic game theory and proof of work maximalists who also believe in self sovereign peer-2-peer private e-cash instead of trusting on custodians.

They’re not trusting in custodians? 🤔