Trump isn't the one that called first it a boycott. He just said it wasn't legal.
Discussion
Meaning it doesn't fit the definition of a legal boycott. Meaning it isn't a boycott. You're not saying anything different. You're just confused by the words.
It's just more semantic manipulation. The left is calling it a boycott and it's not.
This is just stretching. You're going out of your way to favorably interpret what he said. He himself called it a boycott. There is zero legal distinction on legality of a boycott. The concept doesn't exist. If it's a boycott, it's legal.
If he wants to talk about the vandalism, there's a whole bunch of different terms for that, and Trump needs to use his big boy words to refer to it directly.