Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar brugeman

The fact that we're observing some volatility doesn't mean it's different in principle. I don't see any difference in incentives. Only difference is initial audience - web was being grown by tech people, and the only way to participate was to host a web server. Nostr is growing with not tech but freedom-loving people for the most parrt, who for now have some free relays serving them.

Many tech people do have their own relays here, which aren't good for public use, and they shouldn't be. That's why we have outbox model, so that personal relays could participate. The bigger nostr gets, the more valuable being on nostr becomes, the more relays there will be, run by people with profit motives, for themselves and their following.

Avatar
jawn 1y ago 💬 1

I just joined but the obvious thing to me seems to be the extensibility.

in old social media you have to ask permission for API access.

whereas here itd be much easier for a builder to develop on and thus want to spin up a relay because they can control their product experience better

but clearly a lot of UX things to still figure out

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
brugeman 1y ago

Exactly!

Thread collapsed