He's not wrong, he's just early.
Eventually BTC will be everyone's reserve asset.
He's not wrong, he's just early.
Eventually BTC will be everyone's reserve asset.
Yes, but his reasoning is completely wrong.
The "globalists" (code for the Zionist regime that controls USA)
Are not the ones pushing for adoption, they're trying to slow down adoption.
They'll end but being forced to adopt it.
Eventually
The debt based currencies we use today just won't hold any value.
The petro dollar will collapse, KSA won't renew the deal, once they actually start selling their oil for Yeun instead that will rapidly accelerate the dollars decline.
Without the petro dollar the USA empire will collapse the IMF will no longer have their enforcers to use against the world and there won't be anyone preventing bitcoin adoption after that.
Daily trivium : Grammar
"Globalist" is not synonymous with "Zionist" - logically incompatible.
Globalist
noun [ C ] politics
us /ˈɡloʊ.bəl.ɪst/ uk /ˈɡləʊ.bəl.ɪst/
someone who believes that economic and foreign policy should be planned in an international way, rather than according to what is best for one particular country :
Zionist
noun [ C ] politics, religion
us /ˈzaɪ.ə.nɪst/ uk /ˈzaɪ.ə.nɪst/
someone who belongs to or supports a political movement that had as its original aim the creation of a country for Jewish people, and that now supports the state of Israel:
When people say globalists they are usually talking about Zionists.
No the words don't mean the exact same thing.
Globalists are not always Zionists, but all Zionists are globalists that believe in a one world government ruled over by greater Israel.
People who the word globalists to avoid being censored because we are not allowed to criticise Zionists, they own our governments and control our politicians through bribes and blackmail
Logical fallacy: generalization
Its just not that simple...