Who do you trust implicitly to tell the truth about the climate changes and history/future?

All I see are billions (actually, trillions) of fiat dollars being thrown around between large corporations and governments, with very little real scientific evidence to back any of what they're up to.

I've been hearing this stuff for years on end. All I see is money spinning between a handful of big entities. ๐Ÿ˜ตโ€๐Ÿ’ซ

I agree western society is insanely wasteful and we're creating a ton of junk and wasting a lot of resources. That's the fiat system in all its glory. The whole heating planet debate is just part of the same. They're all excuses to spend and print more fiat and increase wealth of elites.

We have human nature and the incentives of the fiat system to be more concerned about than their lies of warmer temperatures.

Fear is their tool. ๐Ÿงก๐Ÿซ‚

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Solving fake problems is what governments do best.

Because the real ones still remain.

Petrol in #Zambia is taxed as an indirect carbon tax. Meanwhile microplastics and mining waste is polluting water and soil. Among environmental issues, I think the precedence that GHG emissions is given is ridiculous here.

I've not found a source that I trust implicitly on the matter. Climate change has complex epistemological and ethical issues connected with it. I've worked with folks who where involved in climate models, and I believe they are working in good faith, but I still don't trust humanities ability to model doom.