There’s a chasm between those 2. Cute false binary
Discussion
There's an ethical responsibility on the part of people hosting notes that link to csam to ensure they don't get through. Fuck off with your 'cute false binary' BS.
No. You implied either flawless or filled with CSAM. YOU fuck off with that horseshit.
If you want increased evidence of moderation, you can just say that. From OP, sounded like you expected assurances of perfection. Which will never happen at the global relay level.
Like others said, take some responsibility for your sensitivity and stay off global. Demanding a match to your ethics code for every host globally is entitled and delusional.
If you want children exploited there's something very fucking wrong with you. We either sort this protocol out, or it's fucked.
Now fuck off.
To be fair with the same logic you could ask for censorship in the bitcoin protocol because bad people use it too.
Bad people will undoubtedly use available tech, but if there's no effort to protect standard users of nostr then it's not going to last or grow because the good people will leave. It's not much of a sales pitch, is it? Join nostr, be exposed to CP. No one sane is going to want to join that or stick around. Nostr.build does a lot of work, using available tools, to protect themselves and legitimate users. If relay operators don't adopt some sort of similar techniques they'll not only be failing the community they support, they'll be leaving themselves open to claims of liability. What really concerns me is that I'm only connected to a handful of standard relays that loads of people use. It's not even like it's notes on some random outlier relay that no one else uses.