1 and 3 are similar and both take stance that it's bogus/debunked and mock lawmakers for even bothering to address potential with lawmaking.

2 is something being looked into but not out there yet, if I skimmed correctly.

I just think if I really made it my life mission to prove it, and it were true, I'd be able to pull it off. Do a bunch of time lapse analysis, buy high power scopes to record planes up close, compare visuals to public flight logs, etc.

But never see that, not to mention again how insane the scale of required operation would be (trails are seen everywhere all over world, everyday).

Yet it is odd in a Mandela effect way that it looks way different than when I was younger

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Yes I put up 1 and 3 because you’re supposed to believe the opposite of what the government and media says lol this is what successful gaslighting does. You are denying the evidence before your eyes that this isn’t normal. Smoke doesn’t stay up there for that long. It’s a chem trail.

Not all news is from bizarro world and reverse-factual, but I get your point. Like I said, can't completely shake it. More 70% sure it's nothing and 30% keeping my eye on it further 👀