The issue is ambiguity. "Native American" is the name of a genetic race like Caucasian and Mongoloid, and it is used to denote a land of birth. I am both (well, not much the prior, but I can trace lineage).

Ambiguity is the enemy of clarity and the friend of deceit.

nostr:nevent1qqspn6ytmkxe7e07m36azd7e2x7ggg68cemk2wvgrcxkf0nyrg3jskqppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qgsq6pjgpvxxuwlrexs6vht7d0pqjy3864dlf3m7adsr0wnhwmpspmqrqsqqqqqpn53mry

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I think the pertinent point in his statements is that people whose ancestors built one of the greatest nations in history can and should call themselves native Americans today. The building of this nation marked a new chapter in human history.

The history of the stone age tribes that were living here when European settlers arrived is not very important. They were living on the land like children, accepting whatever nature provided with no notion of how to maximize what the land could provide. Europeans came along and started working the land, and built the greatest civilization on earth. That is the history that we should celebrate today.

Right, agreed. I'm just adding that the genetic grouping and geographic origin may benefit from a better linguistic distinction.