Replying to Avatar waxwing

You're missing a lot in that characterization, but the main reason such an analogy might be made, even if it's ultimately an unfair one, is the pro-filter arguments don't make sense "mechanically" (they don't achieve the intended goal *and* they harm the network) and are actually anathema to the entire purpose of bitcoin, which is censorship resistance.
Avatar
BitcoinIsFuture 3mo ago

99.9% of the nodes on Bitcoin network have OP_RETURN filter with less than 83 Bytes. Bitcoin works well. Is the network harmed? I don't think so.

Is the network now censorship resistant with the filters? Yes. Will it continue to be censorship resistant? Yes. Also, its a monetary network. Bitcoin is Freedom Sovereign Money.

I do think that CSAM will harm the network.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.