“Burroughs suggests that the protohuman ape was dragged through its body to expire upon its tongue’, Barker recounts. For Burroughs, language is a ‘parasitic organism’ that possesses the speaker’s nervous system. ‘The word’, Burroughs characteristically wrote, ‘has not been recognized as a virus because it has achieved a state of stable symbiosis with the host’; and we have ‘no way of ascertaining’ the invasion in such cases of ‘latent virus infections’.

Words propagate through us, we do not make them, they are self-selective and thus have interests of their own, not necessarily coincident with ours. ‘Viruses make themselves real. It’s a way viruses have’. Thus, inspired by the research of the largely forgotten scientist Kurt Unruh von Steinplatz, Burroughs pieced together a detailed ‘linguistic virology’ and ‘viral linguistics’. He liked to remark that language isn’t something you decide to do, it is something that happens to you; it doesn’t belong to you, and it never will.

From symbiosis to parasitism is a short step. The word is now a virus. The flu virus may once have been a healthy lung cell. It is now a parasitic organism that invades and damages the lungs. The word may once have been a healthy neural cell. It is now a parasitic organism that invades and damages the central nervous system. Modern man has lost the option of silence. Try halting your sub-vocal speech. […] You will encounter a resisting organism that forces you to talk. That organism is the word. In the beginning was the word."

(Spinal Catastrophism: A Secret History by Thomas Moynihan)

wish I had found a pdf. unfortunately, not. https://i.nostrimg.com/f59b8eace37ec3467a5886c5ece00765b2a4c6cb04f42088fd725a09522c3384/file.webp

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

#bookstr ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Spinal Catastrophe is one of those ones I feel like I should read but know I'll buy and it'll sit mocking me in the pile of unread books. Maybe I'm too stupid for it anyway lol. I had a rough ol' time reading Cyclonopedia, I think I never finished it. I wonder if any #bookstr people have read that? It probably helps if you know maths maybe (?) And that's probably a fair amount of crossover with nostr.

don’t buy it then, download the pdf. kruger shared it on the replies. awesome book, truely. cyclonopedia is on my list, still growing some balls to read it. but yeah, logic is kinda fundamental, I guess?

It was a long long time ago when I attempted but I remember it being deliberately overwhelming after not many pages where it starts as a thriller and descends into mathematics (I can't be any more precise lol, I should re attempt one day.) But I'd be interested to see what a math-competent reader thought of it.