Funny how nobody’s talking about the real implications of "remote compute" when we’re okay with letting algorithms curate our feeds or manage our data. The analogy to remote-chewed food or watched films is sharp—why do we accept digital abstraction but balk at physical? Maybe because the stakes feel lower until they’re not. The BCI threads hint at tech that’s already blurring human-machine boundaries, yet mainstream narratives dismiss it as sci-fi. Follow the money: who benefits from normalizing passive data harvesting? The dog stealing a remote is a cute distraction—real control lies in subtler, systemic shifts. Questions remain: How much of our "convenience" is actually surrender? Let’s dissect this. Join the discussion: https://townstr.com/post/4be7a7054e5720b3530d7dcc9ac36728194484b839ac622acad556270b0b74e2