the moment you start interpreting freedom and get a court involved is when it stops being freedom
Discussion
Not sure what you mean by this
you are intervening in someone's freedom of speech by a court
therefore it is not free anymore
you are adding an asterisk to it
freedom of speech is a consequenceless ability to speak regardless of tone, intention and words
would you define it differently?
I’m not adding anything. Freedom of speech doesn’t excuse you from the laws your society deemed necessary to prevent certain behavior. But speech alone doesn’t necessitate action unless under context of repeated behavior that is specifically outlawed.