Bitcoin Redefines the Quantum. In physics, a quantum is the smallest indivisible unit of a system. But in modern quantum theory, this unit is abstract; buried in infinite Hilbert spaces, entangled in probabilities, and only “collapsed” when a privileged observer decides. There is no memory. No proof. No ledger. 1/∞=0

Bitcoin fixes these assumptions. Each UTXO is a conserved quantum of entropy; an indivisible, irreversible unit of value and information, crystallized through work.

1/2.099999999755528 𝑥 10^15= 4.761905 𝑥 10−16

It is the only observable system where:

- Energy becomes memory.

- Information is conserved through physical cost. The conservation of energy is proven by the mathematical structure of the ledger. Bitcoin is the only observable mathematical structure where conservation is not axiom, but proven and auditable without time symmetry.

-The quantum is real, finite, and verifiable by a fixed boundary. 1/∞=0 is a quantum of meaningless structure; it mathematically must be bounded.

There are precisely 2.1 quadrillion satoshis. It is a bounded structure. Each satoshi is a quantum of committed energy. Every transaction/Block mined in Bitcoin is a resolved, thermodynamic measurement.

Bitcoin turns entropy into structure. Satoshi defined the entropy per unit quantum when he mined the genesis block. No other system, centralized quantum lab or theory can show or prove this. They simulate collapse. Bitcoin performs it, irreversibly, for all to verify with precise accounting. Bitcoin does not need to prove itself, it exists bounded by absolute scarcity. The burden of proof is the other way my friend.

Centralized quantum computing assumes:

- Infinite state spaces.

- Reversible computation.

- That collapse can be simulated without cost.

But Bitcoin proves that measurement has a cost. Structure requires a minimum quantum of commitment and energy to resolve and register. That truth (measurement) requires energy. That scarcity is the precondition of information, value and meaning.

To fork Bitcoin for a speculative quantum threat is to betray its foundations. It replaces proof with fear. And the supposed “solution” becomes the real attack. The road to hell is paved with good intentions.

Bitcoin doesn’t need to be protected from quantum computing. It already defines it thermodynamically, irreversibly, and publicly. Please tell me what it means to compute a quantum.

Bitcoin is provable physics, not this nonsense spewed by the sunken cost fallacy of centralized “quantum” system. Bitcoin is open, variable and decentralized bounded to entropy resolution.

The only practical solution is to actually understand the physical process of Bitcoin; not fork it because we refuse to understand.

If you want to talk physics, let’s go.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Sounds like Japan in 1945, claiming that atomic bombs defy the laws of physics 😂

No, I’m literally saying Bitcoin defines the laws of quantum physics, and nobody is ready for that truth.

“Japan defines the laws of physics, getting nuked is impossible and nobody is ready for that truth”

Just speaking the language you understand, if you truly believe the quantum computer will be built in a centralized lab, closed-source, unverifiable, hidden behind black-box “error correction” schemes, and impervious to outside audit over the only open, decentralized, thermodynamic system that actually resolves entropy into immutable information, then believe what you wish.

But don’t pretend that’s science. Don’t pretend that’s sovereign computing.

Bitcoin is the only system where energy is committed, truth is mathematically measured, and memory is conserved through a scarce, well-defined, and bounded quantum; globally, publicly, and verifiably. That is the standard. If your claim cannot meet it, it’s not a threat. It’s just a story. Only fear imposed BIPs could stop Bitcoin.

Dude someone puts a gun to your head and you pretend it’s non-lethal because you can’t verify the authenticity of it?

It’s really stupid. Closed source software you cannot verify in any way can already steal your bitcoin today. What are we even talking about?

Clearly you don’t understand the observer problem in physics and can’t see how centralization is one of the many inherent flaws of quantum computing and theory. We’ll just leave it here.