I suggest that you just read it; ChatGPT won't do it justice. There is no "short cut" to understanding...
Discussion
I don't agree, cause you area assuming that everyone has the same way of understanding, or worst, that everyone has your same one! Or worst of worst, that yours is better than anyone else.
I learn things in different ways, and my ways maybe short cuts for you, but arent for me..
How come you capitalists are individualists only when it comes to your banki accopunts, while you all share the same lame sentences (read books, there is no shortcut...) aren't you being a little .... communist?? ahahahah
Why do we sound the same? Well, because there is such a thing as right and wrong: in history, there is fact and there is fiction; in math, there is the right answer, and the wrong answer. "Two pianos tuned to the same fork are thereby in tune with each other."
I'm saying that you should read it to understand what *Rothbard* was saying; there are a lot of details that ChatGPT will skip; and, to be honest, it's actually a very enjoyable read. I do hope you'll consider it. If it's too long, then perhaps you'll consider reading (or listening?) to something like Bastiat's [The Law](https://mises.org/library/law) which gets more to the point of private property. But Rothbard rehearses the history of how the Progressive movement basically eclipsed the more classical liberal/capitalist movement. Cheers and good luck.