Depends which god and how big is the test tube.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

For example you could put the Christian god Jesus in a test tube if the test tube is big enough.

God created all things including space, time and matter.

We humans can not trust on our intelligence on what that really means.

We can make guesses, hypothesises and assumptions. And try make a model with known information. But you still we can never fully understand what the creator understands because he is omnipresent and knows all things.

I’m fraud. Believing there is a external creator sounds like something for us to blame our actions in the name of God on. But then deflecting into uncertainty?

Which is better plausible?

Arguing a supreme creator wanting to keep us in fear and dark sounds like a catholic guilt trip too.

Sounds like politicians to me, not divine illuminating creator full of love and what not.

When you receive the Holy Spirit you will know God. You can only receive when you finally surrender to the truth and turn away from your sin.

Metaphors for social and scientific troglodytes doesn’t really make a logical argument about a divine supreme superimposed intentional and judging creator, does it?

Fuck whores truth, what are the logical facts of the mongering?

Murderers and thieves hiding behind fear mongering morale judgements to justify the murdering and thieving appear to hold better logical reasoning argument than guilt tripping and fear mongering, Matt.

And I’m afraid those are crimes, just like treason, rather than sins, Matt.

And mans law is not by any means as forgiving as repenting sins are.

You know what that sounds like? That sounds like Bruce going for Lee instead of Wayne.

Receiving cock you mean, Matt?

Can’t argue with the coming of man is what lifes, however, gender whattism is false cored, since it’s not a versus reasoning context to make life.