Thoughts? Is Riot "taking advantage of viewers who don't know any better" or is he just making a point that maybe NYT is engaged in taking advantage of readers who don't know any better?

PC gamer assumes the viewing audience is just stupid.

The language is this article is just derogatory without examining the actual point Pierre was making. "The man in the helmet, hurr durr"

Bet the author thinks we still mine with GPUs too.

https://www.pcgamer.com/if-you-thought-things-couldnt-get-stupider-someone-just-held-a-co2-reader-up-to-a-pc-to-prove-bitcoin-mining-has-zero-carbon-emissions/

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I genuinely believe it is the author of the article who is the complete idiot in this case.

Dunning-Kruger Syndrome is real.

Why is PC Gamer running response editorials to Riot videos? I mean I get that somebody somewhere has an agenda, but talk about random AF.

That's exactly what I thought.