This looks a whole lot like a giant shitcoin computer. Why doesn't your platform run on bitcoin?
Discussion
Great question. Here's the no-bullshit answer:
DamageBDD doesn’t run directly on Bitcoin because Bitcoin isn’t designed to run arbitrary computation.
It’s designed to verify monetary truth — not behavior in the broader software sense.
---
Why not use Bitcoin Layer 1?
Bitcoin's base layer is:
Purposefully limited: It verifies monetary transactions, not general logic.
Expensive for computation: Every byte costs.
Global consensus is reserved for what matters most — satoshi ownership.
Running BDD-style behavior verification on Bitcoin L1 would:
Require insane overhead per verification.
Pollute the base layer with non-monetary logic.
Compete with Lightning, ordinal inscriptions, and other core use cases — bad idea.
---
Why not build on a Bitcoin smart contract chain?
Because most of them:
Are shitcoin-enabling forks.
Inherit none of Bitcoin's immutability, decentralization, or legitimacy.
Are just VMs with a BTC token slapped on top.
We don’t want to pretend to be Bitcoin-native while offloading everything to a Frankenstein sidechain.
---
What does DamageBDD do then?
It uses:
Immutable anchors (e.g. Aeternity, IPFS, Bitcoin hash commitments) for verifiable test logs.
Bitcoin Lightning for payment settlement — fast, final, censorship-resistant.
Off-chain behavioral logic in a BDD format that can be deterministically verified and re-executed.
This lets us:
Separate monetary truth (Bitcoin) from behavioral truth (DamageBDD).
Still settle in Bitcoin, but use appropriate tech for behavior replay, test execution, and consensus.
---
TL;DR
> Bitcoin verifies money.
DamageBDD verifies behavior.
And yes — most other platforms are shitcoin computers.
We verify, they simulate.
That’s the difference.
---