Replying to Avatar Cyph3rp9nk

For the moment I would not consider drivechain because there are many new features to be exploited that theoretically solve scalability and privacy problems, I do not think that these two needs are the goal of drivechain.

- RGB

- Mercury Layer

- ARK
7c
nobody 2y ago

This is blowing my mind. The idea is simple... swap keys to the coins instead of the coin balance themselves. This impacts mining then for sure.

RGB looks really interesting. I need time off work just to go down all the rabbit holes. So fascinating.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Cyph3rp9nk 2y ago

This was already successfully implemented in mercury wallet, but mercury wallet is a centralized service and charges fees for exiting the statechain, 0.5%.

https://mercurywallet.com/

I want to see how they implement mercurylayer at the protocol level and see if they want to make it a business like coinjoin or their old wallet or really contribute to the benefit of bitcoin and make it protocol in the same way as Lightning or RGB.

7c
nobody 2y ago

Yes. If this can be done in a pure, decentralized and trustless/secure way... then its a game changer. It could even subverting.

Avatar
bitcoinaz 2y ago

😐 that's a lot...