Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar mike

I am ashamed of myself.

I disagree with Adam Back on something.

He’s advocating changing the Bitcoin units from “Sats” to “Bits”, primarily because Bits makes sense as a fraction of a “Bit Coin”, but also historical references as Bit has been used to denote many units of historical currency.

I hate the idea, yes hate. Here’s why:

Electric car charging. If you charge your car in public you are “charged” to charge your car. You are typically charged $0.50 per 1KW/h of charge. This dual use of the same word constantly frustrates me.

Also a bit is an octal unit of a Byte, where as a Sat is a decimal unit of Bitcoin.

Currently we are charged 1 Sat / vByte for a transaction.

If we were charged 1 Bit / vByte for a transaction, is that Bit 1/8 of a Byte or 1 / 100,000,000 of a Bitcoin?

That’s my 2 Sats view on the debate. Sorry Adam, don’t hate me.

https://x.com/LuganoPlanB/status/1924348844772352187

Avatar
Judge Hardcase 7mo ago

Great points. Also, to me that 'bit' is a fraction of 'bitcoin' is a strike against using 'bit'... I'm pretty sure that borrowing 'bit' from the fact that other currencies have historically used it isn't necessarily a good thing, either.

I'm not opposed to coming with another term for 'sat', but this push to force a change is stupid. Just start using another term if you want. If it organically catches on, great! That's how language actually works... not by fiat.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.