I think you misunderstand a little bit. This comment isn't to disincentivize saving. There's nothing wrong with saving, in fact bitcoin is great to save due its long term appreciation vs a keynesian method disincentivizing saving via inflation.

This is specifically a comment towards hoarding. We (as Bitcoiners) won't hodl a parallel economy into existence. There has to be some signal to merchants that people actually want to use bitcoin as a medium of exchange instead of fiat.

End of the day people will do what they want but for myself Bitcoin has the most value as a money that cant be fucked with. If people dont use it as money and only treat it as a speculative asset then IMO we will never reach a "hyper bitcoinized economy" that I hear a lot of maxi types sqwaking about.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I'm by no means an economist and there is context missing from other parts of the book im re-reading Mostly just thinking out loud here.

I don't see a distinction between saving and hording, other than hording sounds bad. People accumulating bitcoin increases it's value relative to everything else. It sends a signal to people who don't yet understand, that this thing is important and valuable and they should pay attention.

Vijay Boyapati, has a good framework for how think about bitcoins's monetization path

Ah I had to look him up. Thats the bullish case for bitcoin guy correct? Ive haven't read that.

I guess I can understand that perspective a bit. Up to a point, I can see how accumulation can be a signal to others and Ill admit there is a lot of subjectivity in the term horde. Ill have to think on it more.