that's the whole point
broad range of algorithms don't centralize among popular accounts, they allow you to very specifically find the type of content you are interested in and your tribe
algorithms have a bad reputation because legacy web needed to have a single generic algorithm that would maximize for revenue and would apply to everybody, they can't give you control over it
and that's how we win
playing a game they CAN'T play
Bingo!
nostr:note10k9hwl2ums0vlhf05paxhhefn9uhxxv0czsjvzmjzgn5ug90du7qe0j2se
Yup! ๐ฏ
Iโm so happy that somebody with your values and philosophy is building on here every day
Thank you Pablo.
Thank you.
Everybody that's here now is shaping what we're all building together.
๐
Pablos IQ must be almost 4000
hahahahhaa
Lol seriously where do you score?
they did a test when I was like 6 or so and I got 135, it gave me a lot of problems as a kid so I never took that shit too seriously
I met plenty of people with high IQs that were completely useless; I consider it conceptually invalid like GDP and stuff like that ๐
That canโt be right because I scored 135 and I am completely useless ๐
But I was 16 when I did the test.
afaik it's not supposed to change with age or minimally
again, it's like talking about the sex of unicorns; it's all made up anyway ๐
I donโt think itโs completely invalid.
As an experiment my whole class in high school was forced to do an IQ test.
Those who excelled at mathematics tended to get much higher scores than those who struggled with mathematics.
But yeh IQ fails to show others aspects and characteristics of oneโs personality. Thereโs a lot of high iq people who are lazy and lot of low IQ people who are hardworking. So itโs a terrible predictor of where you end up in life.
I think itโs more just a good test of how individually efficiently you can solve problems.
yeah, that's my issue with it; it's used to measure something that it has little relationship with. It's largely used as a predictor of "success in life" and that is so far from what is being measured.
