๐—ก๐—ผ ๐—ข๐—ป๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—น๐˜€ ๐—•๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ถ๐—ป, ๐—˜๐˜…๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐˜ ๐—ฌ๐—ผ๐˜‚

๐˜ž๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฌ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฐ๐˜ธ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ด ๐˜ง๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ ๐˜ฆ๐˜น๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ค๐˜ฆ

In 2017, it was proven once and for all who runs #Bitcoinโ€™s protocol.

Itโ€™s not miners, large corporations, or even Twitter influencers.

Itโ€™s ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚.

Find out why and how in 1min below๐Ÿ‘‡

In "The Blocksize War", Jonathan Bier chronicles the heated debate over how to best scale Bitcoin to serve a global population, which soon grew into a fight over who ultimately controls Bitcoinโ€™s protocol.

๐—œ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜ #๐Ÿญ: ๐—ข๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฃ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐˜€

From the beginning, those who wanted large blocks wanted a better user experience sooner, because they wanted Bitcoinโ€™s adoption to grow faster. Those who wanted to keep the blocks small also wanted a better user experience and increased adoption, but they opted for a strategy with a slower pace with more long-term benefits.

๐—œ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜ #๐Ÿฎ: ๐—ข๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐— ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ต๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐˜€

Big blockers from the wealthiest Bitcoin businesses met in secret to discuss and eventually agree upon a proposal that would activate SegWit ๐™–๐™ฃ๐™™ double the blocksize limit. They viewed this as a compromise with the small blockers.

Small blockers from around the world rallied in a grassroots UASF campaign to ensure SegWitโ€™s activation, and that Bitcoinโ€™s blocks remain small. They stood their ground, and refused to compromise. It was a quintessential โ€œDavid vs Goliathโ€ moment.

๐—œ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜ #๐Ÿฏ: ๐—”๐—ด๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜€๐˜ ๐—”๐—น๐—น ๐—ข๐—ฑ๐—ฑ๐˜€

Hundreds of millions of dollars were spent by some of the largest companies in the Bitcoin space, to push for a protocol change to increase the blocksize limit by hard fork. Over 80% of the hashpower had signaled its favorability toward this change. And some of the most influential bitcoiners had thrown their weight behind it, too.

The only option left was for the users to say was โ€œNo,โ€ and thatโ€™s exactly what they did!

๐—œ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜ #๐Ÿฐ: ๐—›๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—”๐—ป๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—น๐˜†

Usually, even the best causes are swiftly co-opted by their enemies, who sneak in undetected, and then dismantle the movement from the inside. This book is the story of one of the few moments in history when that scheme ๐™›๐™–๐™ž๐™ก๐™š๐™™.

๐—œ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜ #๐Ÿฑ: ๐—ฌ๐—ผ๐˜‚ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—น ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—น

The result of the Blocksize War forever set a new precedent for Bitcoin, and how its rules are enforced and upgraded. Itโ€™s now known that the users are in charge, and that the miners and developers work for them.

As new proposals for Bitcoinโ€™s protocol changes arise, ๐˜บ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ must decide whether to use it or not. This is why running a full node is so important.

Whether you were there to experience it or not, โ€œThe Blocksize Warโ€ will give you a new level of appreciation and confidence for how Bitcoin's protocol works, and how the network became what it is today.

Useful insights? โžก๏ธ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐˜€๐˜ and ๐—•๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ธ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ธ this tweet for future reference!

Got a book you want me to explore next? โžก๏ธ Let me know in the ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐˜€! ๐Ÿ‘‡

See you at next week's Bitcoin insight!

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.