Hivecoin, Jesus, more shitcoinery. And you're wrong, it does affect Bitcoin and everyone owning Bitcoin. It changes miner incentives. We don't, and can't, know how exactly, but it can lead to greater centralization in a number of ways. It's a risk that cannot just be ignored, particularly when there's nothing about DC that actually benefits Bitcoin. The main argument has always been "destroy shitcoins by enabling them on DC". I don't know any Bitcoiner who wants those degens leaching on Bitcoin. It's bad enough we got NFT inscriptions.
Not hivecoin, it's hivemind.
Thread collapsed
DC would have prevented the inscription controversy and many others. If you would check the Drivechain FAQ you would see many other potential uses for DC.
But you are part of the maxi botnet, and will just keep veing toxic until poisoning yourself instead of reading primary sources on the project.
Agree, people take conclusions without read anything.
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
I mistyped hivemind as hivecoin.
hivecoin would be the name without drivechain, haha.
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
It’s bitcoin, not a shitcoin. All coins on a sidechain is redeemable on mainchain.
But a sidechain can do much more than mainchan while never risking any of the coins there.
Coins are always at risk on a side chain
Thread collapsed
No, you can ask the miners to give you mainchain coins, but there's no guarantee of any sort there
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
