Replying to Avatar freemymind 🇨🇭

Thanks for the explanation. In some special cases this can be true. But longterm I do not see a single person win any of these Ideas against AI.

Since AI has more data than you would ever be able to read in your live, does not even forget a single special case and human actitude is probably what machines are trained in for the longest time.

Google and Facebook almost do not invest in anything that has not to do with understanding the individuals nuances. So psychologically I assume the AI is already far better today.
Avatar
The Daniel 🖖 5mo ago

In a world where both lawyers and judges are replaced by AI, you’d better hope the one you’re depending on has the best logic.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
freemymind 🇨🇭 5mo ago 💬 3

No. When both sides have the ideal judge, the person which is innocent will not be sent to jail that often and the person that is guilty would not walk in freedom as often as today.

Avatar
The Daniel 🖖 5mo ago

Based on my observation of reality, I can’t say I share your optimism.

Avatar
🍄🌈🎮💻🚲🥓🎃💀🏴🛻🇺🇸 5mo ago

Too bad truth isn't on the blockchain

Avatar
freemymind 🇨🇭 5mo ago

All fine. It is an Ideal. Not really optimism. And clearly it depends on the trust of people, how much work jourist get.

But I am not working in this field. But assume there is more jourists working outside the court than inside.

I think those working at the court are probably save for longer. But those working for consolidation to build a house, for companies to check what is within the legal and so could be replaced faster by AI.