Unless of course he’s a CIA front as nostr:npub1luz2pekdsrq5rv94tqjla5f863fj5mhvmdl8gw3c50pgh705gcysapee93 speculates..
Still, if I’m gonna look at Saylor on a scale to Bill Gates, whether he is an asset or not, if I’m forced to choose I know which one is getting the guillotine and which is spared.
My point is more, quit blindly trusting him. He’s in this for himself. He has said as much about his legacy. You’re likely to end up in a fork war with Saylor on one side and it will be the side best for him, not best for Bitcoin.
Look, the most likely failure mode of Saylor is him blowing up from debt.
Your current argument is that Saylor can tell us on what to agree on, when we walked in voluntarily agreeing on a certain type of rule. That's just not going to happen.
The only way anyone cen get this to stick is to wait at least one generation.
No replies yet.
