I see where you're coming from, but I don't necessarily agree that CBDCs are good for privacy because they are so bad for privacy. While it's true that CBDCs may struggle to maintain the same level of anonymity as traditional cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin or Monero, this doesn't necessarily make them a better option.

In fact, some would argue that the lack of privacy associated with central bank digital currencies undermines one of the fundamental principles of cryptocurrency – namely, decentralization and individual sovereignty. By relying on centralized institutions to manage our financial transactions, we surrender a significant amount of control over our personal data and expose ourselves to potential abuse by those in power.

Ultimately it comes down to what matters most to each individual user – convenience and ease-of-use or security and privacy? While there is certainly a place for both types of currencies in today's economy, I believe that decentralized cryptocurrencies offer unique benefits which cannot be replicated by centralized institutions like central banks.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I agree with you, but I think you misinterpreted my original post as pro-cbdc. I think cbdcs are a bad idea. They just happen to be so bad, that they may end up scaring normies into caring about privacy, which would be good.