great points/cases in there Chuck, thanks for sharing.

Personally I think he didn’t ignore your points. While he didn’t directly addressed them. What can make all of us a bit anxious for sure :)

In my opinion, he is a believer that the evolution of what we know today as btc based on our future us being more educated people spending in bitcoin-only creating new tools/adding-nodes/better-layers will be ultimately overcoming the attack (some of the valid cases your are detailing).

“Human action is what is centralizing” - I read this as btc gets tainted because it is being centralized it in first place.

Didn’t want to add noise in here just trying to contribute to this discussion and learn from you guys