So the whole science community hasn't provided any evidence of it? That's for agreeing.
Discussion
The 'science community' provided evidence.
Then the engineers built power stations using it.
The armed forces made submarines that go uderwater for months at a time using it too.
But sure. You keep asking for the snapchat of an atom splitting, I'm going to make one for you later. I have all the kit in my garage, and my iPhone is ready to film it!
Thereβs an essential aspect to this story that doesnβt add up: nuclear power stations are supposedly everywhere, but there is no real, observable evidence of the processes and results of these reactors.
Weβre told that nuclear reactors power cities, but we donβt have images, footage, or clear, independent demonstrations of the processes involved. Where are the real-time videos or experiments? Why is the evidence so opaque?
First paragraph - there are! What exactly do you think generates the power from a nuclear reactor, if it isn't fission?
Hamsters on wheels?
Second paragraph - footage of what?
The power stations are there ffs, power comes out of them, what more "footage" do you need?
You can drive and look at one. My god, you are dumb.
The evidence isn't opaque. You are just too stupid to understand it.
There. I said the quiet bit out loud. Now go deal with it.
There is no disagreement what is generating the power - water is heated and used to generate electricity.
The claim is atoms are split which causes heat that is used to heat the water and generate electricity.
This is all clear or?
Please provide video/Fotos of the practical demonstration to prove atoms can be split.
I'm sure this has been verified many times over in the science community judging by your confidence.
As you probably already know, the original experiments were not documented and none since either.
Perhaps you can provide evidence of the assumed used materials U-235 , Pu-239 and Radium Bromide? Would that make it easier for you?
Of course, no evidence exists for them either. π β’οΈ
So what exactly do you think is happening, if fission isn't occurring?
The science provided the theory, the engineers built it based on the theory.
The evidence is the fact you recognise Plutonium exists right?
It is made as a byproduct of Uranium derived fission in a nuclear reactor ffs.
I can only assume electricity is being produced in conventional ways that have been proven and verified.
I haven't researched it, only the 3 products I mentioned to you that we're supposedly used in the "discovery" experiment. But, If there is no fission, how can there be a byproduct??
Do you think it's a red flag that there are no Fotos or videos of these items?
The scientific method demands claims and discoveries be repeatable and verifyifable by peers.
Just when I think you couldn't get any dumber, you write:
"But, If there is no fission, how can there be a byproduct??"
That's my point you numpty. In goes Uranium. Fission happens, and a byproduct that we KNOW comes out, is Plutonium.
It is so rare naturally, the logical question you should be asking yourself is "where did we get it from, if not via fission?"
I'm not even going to address "conventional means" of where the power comes from if not via fission. There is no coal in there dude, just as there are no hamsters in there.
Honestly, right now something in your brain should be telling you it may be time to recognise you dont understand something, so rather than lean on retards, perhaps the best approach would be to try and learn it?
If there is no photos of them, how do you know they exist? You are the one who is emotionally attached. Please stop projecting your biases. You haven't brought anything to the conversation, let alone any proof of your claims.
We are going in circles here, so let's call an end to it. We can agree that you have a belief in nuclear fission that deviates from objective reality and this is cult like behaviour.
I am in awe at how stupid people have become.
If there is any emotion, it is depression lol.
You can literally google a picture of Plutonium.
How does that help you?
You wouldn;t even know i what you are looking at is real - be honest.
https://cdn.nostrcheck.me/f7dd6fe2a87450cab9235f2794d52ebfd2b7824d717ae4736a808d1ca12ab7b6.mp4
https://cdn.nostrcheck.me/8c2b593f9ab767fc4de6e38912e153e7c8ebc13316a543199eef8b1903a55e83.mp4
https://cdn.nostrcheck.me/7d28872470b1a14f049e30504a3777dd74318914c12e547ddc88d5dd6718d928.mp4
https://cdn.nostrcheck.me/daaa529d7b0ef90b10c73833b15abfaa3983f4cd4e994bfb1d8573cca4bc0d36.mp4
Again, can you prove the plutonium has been produced in this process? I have already told you that there is no photographic evidence of the inputs, of the process and so why would I believe a so called "output".
Finally we are agreed upon something, people (like you) are stupid/wilfully ignorant and don't know how to think for yourself.
Let's end it here. You have nothing new to add.
Yes. There is nuclear waste. With Plutonium in it.
Where else did it come from?
This is what I am talking about - you have no idea what fission is really.
If you did, you wouldn't ask for a picture, because you would know the very concept of a picture is nonsensical.
It is like asking for a photo of gravity lol.
Gravity is an easy one - there are lots of practical experiements you can do yourself to verify the upward vector. - you know.. .science.
It's the same with nuclear fission - you can measure the output - Plutonium and heat and electricity - you just can't do it yourself!!
So you have to be able to verify it yourself personally to be classed as true?
If not, we just believe some other weird theory that *checks notes* we also cannot prove? π€£
Thats my whole point numbnuts. Whats worse is that there is literally *checks notes* nobody verifying nuclear fission. Trust me bro. Science! TM.
What do you mean nobody verifying it?
Every nuclear reactor in the world is verifying it in real time.
Just as you cannot have a photo of gravity, but jumping off a building will hammer the point home real fast.
You really are peak retard. You're so dumb, you don't even know you're dumb. It blows my mind. Truly, a spectacle to behold.
you're repeating yourself. make sure your jabs are working. are you wearing a mask right now?
And there it is. Peak retard.
Because one thing was proved to be a lie, everything you don't understand but called a lie by retards, must therefore also be a lie.
Just think that through.... If you can, ofc.
In the interim there are nuclear powered naval ships travelling the world, without as much as a sniff of refuelling. I suppose that's the solar panels on the roof, right? π
you got any decent leads on this hole?
there are plenty of debunkers of "quantum" pennistech in the tubes, but little on nuclear self-pleasuring implants...
Anybody making a claim should be able to back up their claim with a practical demonstration. There is nothing practical documented from the original "discovery" of atom splitting and look up Geiger counters for a laugh. They sell them at Chernobyl actually... Talking of which, the Babushkas there seem to be thriving.. along with the nature.
leads?
The burden of proof is on those who claim it. Real world observable evidence should be provided.
i got you bro... just looking for more arrows.
i do wonder whether the nuclear power capabilities are real, while the "exploding death object" aspect is propaganda...
The nuclear power is also a scam. They use renewables/coal/LNG to heat the Steam towers to balance the electricity load.
It is part of the fiat scam to make people think it's hard to generate electricity so they can charge money for something that is massively abundant and free flowing.
We don't even really know what electricity is. We know what it does, but what it is , not. Tesla said our whole world is electro magnetic.