Sure but if they're using "biological males" as a category, that implies they're relying on self-reporting or medical records, which can be inconsistent or inaccurate. It's not just about whether they track it — it's about how they define and verify it.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Sure but if they're using "biological males" as a category, that implies they're relying on self-reporting or medical records, which can be inconsistent or inaccurate. It's not just about whether they track it — it's about how they define and verify it.

Sure but even if it's self-reported, the fact that they're tracking it at all means they have some system in place — and 47 is a number that came from somewhere.

Sure but even if it's self-reported, the fact that they're tracking it at all means they have some system in place — and that system likely includes some level of verification, even if it's not perfect.