Nostr Web Client

Could the Earth be MUCH younger than "they" would have you believe?

https://youtu.be/lt5kQSoMtMs?si=oRo1e1luXYemX5ZB

#ConspiracyToday

"The authenticity of the #Bible would mean then that the Biblical history is the true history of this Earth not the Pagan history we're taught in our textbooks and our science classes. Has nothing to do with Biblical history, has nothing to do with God's history of the Earth.

"Scientifically we're saying here is evidence that supports God's history of the Earth. These dinosaur fossils and other fossils are NOT millions of years old. They're going to be just a few thousands of years old, as the Bible would tell us. They almost certainly were preserved by being buried in the Flood. And that would account also for the rapid burial that would give you tissue preservation. You've got to have precise types of rapid burial. A Flood would do that. Other models, they struggle with that some. How did these dinosaur fossils get buried correctly that they would actually preserve for any length of time?

"So what we see scientifically time and time and time again, just as you guys talk about with your archaeology, we would talk about with the paleontology this supports the Biblical history not the Pagan history that we're being taught and the too many Christians are paying attention to.

"Get back to the Biblical history, that's God's history. When you change history you change everything. That's the point that the "Is Genesis History?" movie made: when you start trying to change the Biblical history you change the entire Dynamic of the Bible because everything then starts falling apart."

–Dr. Kevin Anderson

nostr:nevent1qqs9jhqac9ftjtq0zkhwwq7le5r3znzrc60w2ju8qmq2fs66emp9rlspzemhxue69uhhqct5v4ezumn0wd68yvfwvdhk6q3qmt8x8vqvgtnwq97sphgep2fjswrqqtl4j7uyr667lyw7fuwwsjgsxpqqqqqqz5u58cz

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴏꜰ ᴍʟᴇᴋᴜ 1y ago

there is a 12800 year pole shift cycle that is completely regulated by the magnetic fields emanating from the centre of our galaxy and it's gigantic cluster of enormous stars and probably some black holes too

when genesis (and all the other related texts that talk about this) talks about "angels taking human wives" it means that angels are also a kind of human in that they could breed with us

not only were these fallen angels, aka "Watchers" (look that up in your concordance) raping women and breeding hybrids, they likely were doing it with everything else too, by which i mean genetic engineering

there is now solid evidence of a disaster cycle that leads to massive inundation of the land by the oceans during a severe rotation of the earth induced by magnetic field changes, on top of this, during this time the magnetic chaos also can and does cause meteors that might otherwise fly past, to be drawn towards the magnetic fields in their abnormal arrangement, and these hammer the sea, and boil the water for months (like 40 days, for example) that makes so much steam that in addition to all the tsunamis and melting glaciers, the sky is filled with clouds, and due to the meteor impacts, dust, which dramatically cools the air and leads to massive, persistent rain that lasts probably at least months, and, not to forget, a cold period that can last as long as 3000 years

there is nothing different between the facts of history and God's history because this is the universe He created so eventually the facts behind the stories are found

so, also, there is many interpretations that say that the flood was only 6500 years ago, this is wrong... and according to other accounts that relate to it, for example, you can read in some of Plato's writings about stories that date the events of the Flood to approximately 12800 years ago also, and american indians have stories too, so do the australian aboriginals... the rainbow serpent was a meteor and this is the story of the time of the flood as well, the "dreamtime" as they call it

Marakesh 𓅦 1y ago

I am open to these ideas, I would just need more evidence and study on my part. Indeed the Bible does not *say* the Flood happened 6500 years ago, that's just how some people interpret it. Perhaps it actually happened 12800 years ago.

ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴏꜰ ᴍʟᴇᴋᴜ 1y ago

i've been reading "The Book of Jubilees" which is accepted as canon of the bible by several christian and judaic branches and it has many odd things about time and years, as you can imagine, the text is literally about 7 year cycles, and repeatedly uses this as a unit of time, and specifies that a year is 364 years, so, i think probably if you spent some months reading it over and over, making notes, creating a timeline, probably you can get close to a reasonable guess about the timespans that seem to be unreasonable

something that is quite interesting is lifespan

prior to noah, it seems to say that human lifespans could potentially approach around 1200 years, this is how long methuselah and enoch lived

then it says that after the flood, the lifespan of humans shortened to 120 years

if humans were living this long, likely this also means that they didn't have so many children (numbers would be relative to their lifespan, and fertility must have been a longer window than the current 40 years for women)

or there might be some other logic to all this, it's hard to say, but when you can positively connect biblical stories to a plethora of geological and archaeological discoveries, and even astrophysics discoveries, this could give some hint of where to draw markers in the timeline as the time measure we are familiar with

one thing that i personally think confuses things is the issue of plate tectonics and the accumulation of mass of our planet

there is some substantial work, which has been mostly cast into the "tinfoil hat" theories, of old pre-consensus tectonic plate drift theories, that suggests that the reason why it looks like the land of our planet would fit together perfectly on a smaller globe, could be literally because the diameter of the earth has changed

if that diameter changed not because of a hollow-earth style outward expansion from an inner sun, but because something happens inside planets that causes matter to pop out of the void (eg, superconductive, high magnetism, high gravity stuff that breaks the normal space rules about how fast matter can become coherent and then become basically immortal) then you have to consider this in the time calculation

it means that as the planet has grown, our measure of time has become faster and faster

einstein's famous formula implies that in deep space, time is slower than it is here on the surface, and that in the core of our planet, time goes way faster

if the planet's mass is constantly increasing, at a roughly even, cubic curve rate, then it could well be that in Enoch and Adam's time, by the rotations of the sun, and our biological processes, and the process of time (everything, even the gravity would be different), then it could well be - indeed - that estimates of both the age of the universe and the age of our planet are all wrong, and based on a constantly accelerating time flow

i know, that might break your brain but it really seems to me that it could well be correct

i constantly am amazed as i watch fireworks go off 5km away at the other end of this valley, and hear how long the time between seeing the light and hearing the sound, and then think about the scale of this universe, let alone just the scale of our solar system, or galaxy...

i mean, if i understand it correctly, the subjective time that would pass on the surface of the Sun as it roils and bubbles in its cycles, would also be much slower than it looks to us here on the earth... anyhow, enough babbling, i'm just gonna say that the physics of time suggest that existing theories about the history of our planet may actually be quite wrong and making projections based on linear models when the reality is exponential, really changes the whole equation