I've sort of gotten lost in the conversation. Some of it is over my head, now.
Are we looking at ways to double-check the valid ownership of an nsec key to confirm a retirement event or are you guys suggesting something completely different?
Discussion
Is this about improving NIP-05, so that could be the confirmation and proof-of-move?
yeah, nip-05 improvements could help with this also by adding a third field that marks a transition event, to mitigate the possibility of the key transition event not getting everywhere your events also are
also it might make sense to augment the fields of nip-05 so that they are dated and signed, but that would be a messy upgrade
So, we'd need to add a change to 05.md and then reference that section in 09.md.
#yestr
but this is an example of why we need NUDs so we can stop memorising name number codes and use human language references
What is a NUD?
oh, you didn't see that!
it's something nostr:npub1l2vyh47mk2p0qlsku7hg0vn29faehy9hy34ygaclpn66ukqp3afqutajft has been working towards with wikifredia - to move the nostr spec to a nostr hosted format, roughly speaking
Nostr Unofficial (specification) Documents
Ah, good. Yeah, makes more sense on a wiki than in git.