Nostr Web Client

Fine, Vincent. Since nuance gives you a nosebleed, here’s what I believe:

Don’t murder civilians.

Don’t lie to justify wars.

Don’t bomb countries into democracy.

Don’t call genocide ‘necessary.’

And don’t act like Western dominance is a moral compass.

That’s it. No footnotes.

If your brain still short-circuits — drink less Fox News, more water.

Ok. Now maybe there is something to work with.

You say “don’t murder civilians”

What if another regime kill its own civilians? Can you then try to stop it? Bomb the regime?

Please Login to reply.

Ah, the old ‘what if they kill their own people’ routine. Cute. Let’s review what you call stopping murder:

Iraq (2003): No WMDs. Half a million civilians dead. The regime? Gone. The chaos? Permanent.

Libya (2011): NATO bombs under the pretext of ‘protecting civilians.’ Gaddafi gone. Now it's slave markets and warlords.

Vietnam (1965–75): Millions dead. Napalm on villages. All to stop “communist tyranny.”

Syria (2010s): Armed rebels, covert ops, proxy war. Millions displaced. All under ‘moral obligation.’

Chile (1973), Congo (1961), Iran (1953): Regimes killed? Sure. But installed by the West. So who's the killer here?

You don’t protect civilians by bombing them. You don’t rescue people by flattening cities.

Stop pretending airstrikes are humanitarian hugs.

This got boring the moment you started quoting the Pentagon like it's a philosophy textbook. Come back when you’ve read history, not just headlines.