Your words…
I agree with you disagreeing with me.
However, therein lies the problem. You’ve already created in your mind what part of #reality you do not agree with, yet your faith is in doubt (last statement). Your bio says “end the fed,” but you don’t fully understand the entirety of the situation. What of dealing with reality as it is, and starting to build up from there? Read her tweet again, and remember your loyalty is in the USA.
You make a lot of assumptions about me.
I’m confident that the government will not act in my best interests, whichever branch and whichever person is elected.
That doesn’t change my desired outcome, and doesn’t make me less patriotic (that was random, btw) or less realistic.
Liberal talking points need to be ignored. Run the country on the best interests of *this country* is my only point.
Give me one assumption I made, that wasn’t part of your words, bio, or comment. Based on how you understood it. The approach you’re using is already defeating, in that it gives power to a force outside you, that’s supposedly bad for you, no matter what. Fine, you can win that statement, and I can stay in my lane, but a different approach wouldn’t be as bad. To put down those rocks in your arms, and seek a common ground.
You assume by my “end the fed” statement in my bio that I don’t “fully understand the situation.”
What makes you come to that conclusion about me?
And I was telling Yellen to “stay in her lane.” Not you.
Imagine a race, there’s an orange finish line, but many screaming discouraging remarks by the sidelines. Some things are meant to be known, but not clung to as actualities, like inside jokes. It is impossible to serve two masters, and the “fed,” on the sidelines, plays two parts in a single role. The “hidden hand that shaped reality,” and the discouraging chants. However, the rules of the game of life are unchanging, like a walk in a forest remains that. It’s just that in the human realm, everything is upside down, and thus the orange paradise beyond the finish line, is deemed a bubble, and mere paranoia, since the racer, is made to focus on two things, on top of the goal. I hope this makes sense. It not only slows progress, but creates a negative outlook, and the energy needed to win, is wasted on other pursuits/distractions. Secretary Yellen is playing by the game rules, as her tweet shows, and as finance secretary, or treasurer, her role in the office is as the tweets suggest. Now, who is not in their lane?
As requested, I gave you an example of where you assumed something about me.
I guess this is you admitting as much.
And SecTreas should not be opining on NatSec. I stand by that statement. Her opining about the IRS is in her lane, but that was not my comment.
I admit to nothing. You agreed that the assumption was fair. A reflection of you.
National security, and finances go hand in hand. Perhaps she is in a tough situation. All these things are besides the point. How can improvement, and lament go hand in hand? How can bitcoin supporters not hold grudges, but argue their case from a rational, non emotional base of operation?
