i see and so you knew that lightning payments are anonymised the same way as tor packets?

apparently nobody in monero land seems to understand this

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

it's actually even more anonymous than tor because nobody knows except the sender what path it's going to go, even the invoice only contains a midhdleman that the sender makes a new path to that nobody knows

i mean, really, i actually built a whole protocol off this concept, it was basically an extension of lightning chat, but aiming to implement an actual network protocol

it has an issue in that if any hop along the path is clogged up or offline the packet fails and accounting for this is a complex task but hey, you all knew about this "failed payment" problem with lightning right?

It’s silly to compare a "chainless L2" to an on chain transaction on monero.

They are two different things.

privacy and anonymity are actual metrics, lightning definitely is more private, and completely utterly untraceable if you use keysend or AMP

please go do your homework

I have not stated which is better.

They both have there trade offs and are 2 different things trying to achieve the same goal.

lol, keep sipping on the monero kool-aid, you and the rest of the idiot shitcoiners who think that blockchain is the answer, what was the question?

sovereign Lightning UX sucks so >90% of people use custodial solutions

LN is de facto not private.

at least on a blockchain you dont have to do channel management and fuck around with inbound liquidity just to receive a payment.

there are advantages to using a blockchain.

You are talking to one of those people who are more suited to join some kind of cult and never mined crypto, ever.

Monero is a good solution. Has more daily transactions than bitcoin since a few years, it is what people factually use on the streets.

Don't worry about those living in a bubble, they are just here to see "money goes up" and convert virtual coins back to fiat. They might as well have gone to the stock market but somehow believe they are crypto.

Just go on. You are on the right path, question everything. Demand better.

yes! demand outdated, blockchain based security in a pseudo encrypted public ledger that can't be properly audited and is extremely challenging to make a working L2. because privacy > all, most especially more important than a stable, predictable and slow supply growth rate

because muh privacy, even though LN can do it better, and faster, and at such a high volume that bitcoin tx fees have never been this low since like, idk... 2014, but of course you moneros know that the schroedinger's payment volumes must not exist because you can't prove they exist, even though tens of thousands of merchants have adopted it and all these people waiting 2-5 seconds for payment finality are all deluded and everyone knows you can look up their transactions and prove they exist? hang on...

privacy of payments is the question. blockchains are never the answer

You have no idea how i choose to store or move with privacy 🤷🏻‍♂️

that's not a point that's trying to avoid the point