Very sound criticisms. You articulated clearly a number of the points from the recent podcasts I’ve heard him on, where something just seemed to be missing. Especially around “securing data” that isn’t Bitcoin data.

I am curious as to your thoughts in the closing paragraph, “However, it is worth considering the implications of what might happen if his target audience accepts and adopts this thesis.”

Anything in particular you’re concerned about?

Thanks for the thoughtful review 🤙