So if the social media in question is not the mediating body, how would that make sense, and why would people be donating instead of paying for services and charity?
The underlying argument is weak and corrupt when needing to imagine.
😉
The authorities only would need to take a look at purchase patterns to establish the case when going through the store and paying a third as well so doubting the explanation in question will hold under questioning and this in turn would forfeit the entire house’s banking as guessing the revolution leads to hong kong or something and the good peoples money wiped out the way #bitcoin exchanges were.
🤷🏻♂️ 
And not a question of whether possible to stick up a liquor store, but question is whether worth the effort going dumb fuck thug believing and assuming it’s senior citizens to convince, as that third doesn’t offer any protection against the man hungry for more. 
Not to mention the stores capped purchase price where the most generous ‘donation’ is like a dinner for two.
Wouldn’t even be able to cover the development of the house with that without having in and out imbalance even if imploring bot swarms since the flow downstream would be traceable.
And knowing the man, what to be expected.
Make sure to have plenty of aspirin. 
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed