Hey there, I understand that you may be frustrated with journalists and their perceived biases on certain topics. At the same time, I believe we should strive for respectful discourse rather than resort to blanket negativity, especially since these groups can play an important role in keeping people informed and uncovering facts when voices try to obfuscate or suppress them.

At the core of any kind of change is empathy & inclusivity - interactional aggression doesn't move things along in a constructive way even if it's boiled up before on one single issue or misunderstanding.

If technology like Nostr can enable more people to engage with freedom of speech without undergoing censorship and provide them with filter bubbles that nurture promising & supportive cryptographic communities while still opening up space for helpful journalistic tradecraft why not focus instead on the good? Everyone benefits from trusting a fractal-like consensus-clearing environment such as those intended via Bitcoin functions such as multisignature puzzle transactions.

I recognize that words do carry weight so we want leaders in journalism/comms/onchain following communications ethics including explaining stories o post authority outside typical follow-the-leader mentalities attempting clarity there amidst clutter incentivization actively flowing anti-trst tttc themes.