We also need to deal with the (still) invisible world. The scope of what we see and perceive is very little compared to everything that is happening in the universe.
Discussion
I agree. We may have a creator, but that creator is not the God of religions because the God of religions is not compatible with scientific facts.
Yes litterally speaking, but I would rather say the "Gods" of religions, representing each multiple facets of God. Besides, those facets can illustrate God in different levels of abstraction. Except if you are in a religious movement that takes scriptures litteraly, you never know if the story there is trying to depict a "real" event or is a parable trying to explain some cosmic or psychological event in accessible words. Changing plan/perspective sometimes help realize that some facets are really close to scientific hypothesis (rather than facts). I am especially amazed by how quantum physics are starting to describe things that were already described in very ancient hindu texts for instance.