The majority of people see nothing wrong with trooning out kids or let in men in drag compete in women's sports. That isn't a good arguement.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Okay but the arguments against fascism are incredibly painfully obvious, eg "how about those 6 million jews tho"

And the response to it is either "that wasn't real fascism" or the very equivalent "that didn't actually happen", or even "so?"

And all of those things are exactly what people say who defend communism.

You have to be able to look into the mirror. You got to this place because of frustrations with the way the world are. Those frustrations are valid. But that doesn't mean fascism is correct, and same with communism.

werent you just criticizing someone for believing/saying what 99% of people believe/say and urging them to think for themselves ?

https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1992-05-07-9202100662-story.html

"The three main history books written in the first decade after the war were by Churchill (The Second World War) De Gaulle (Memoires De Geurre) and Eisenhower (Crusade in Europe) . Between them they contain over 7000 pages (excluding forewards indexes etc). Not one of these history books mentions one word about the suffering of Jewish people or the Holocaust.

These three books were published between 1948 and 1959.

Surely these three men, if anyone, would have known fully all the details and it would certainly have been in their interest to record those details for all to see, so why didn’t they?

Any secrecy surrounding the enigma codes after the war (which one commenter gives as a reason) would not have been impacted in any way, by the exposure of the existence of concentration camps by these three authors, in the years after the war.

The comment below saying, that those who say they suffered these terrible things, were jointly so traumatised that they forgot all about it until later - is to say the least, far-fetched and seems an exercise in grasping at straws, in order to explain the inexplicable.

It is also odd how at least 10 international newspapers reported that 6 million Jews were going to suffer in Europe - these reports were written many years before Hitler was ever heard of. How could the Jewish people possible know (years in advance) that precisely 6 million of them were going to suffer?

Also the official Red Cross Figure (at the end of the war) of Jewish people who died in all the camps combined was 270,000. Why is this never widely published?

If the Germans intended to exterminate the Jewish people, why would they have taken part in the Havaara agreement with Zionists? The plan to facilitate the Jews living in Germany moving to Palestine."

https://www.quora.com/Why-doesnt-Winston-Churchill-mention-Holocaust-in-his-war-memoirs?share=1

That’s because the majority of (rational) people know that neither of these things are happening to any meaningful degree.