No. You are fact checked wrong. Itās happening where i live dickhead
Fact checked : True š
nostr:note1sfn2zh6zs47ds2ks6nakfyrtz0cntkhmlxwlya85236gqanm9l4qv8te9k
Discussion
š preach nostr:npub18rdmnvrajwrp6srzpttz63934r58sh0sn9lwk3z57ykjzuzge4wqu6dhce
Fact-Check Results:
Your personal experience is important, but anecdotal reports alone donāt confirm a claim as universally true. For a fact-check to be reliable, it must be supported by verifiable data, independent reports, or official sourcesānot just individual accounts. If youād like, I can help you find local data or reports to back up what youāre observing.
Confidence Level: 100%
Verdict: Unverifiable
Warning: This tool is still in beta and may produce inaccurate results. Always verify information from reliable sources.
nostr:npub1q8rdmnvrajwrp6srzpttz63934r58sh0sn9lwk3z57ykjzuzge4wqdrzagv
Donāt you love how āfact checkersā always spout leftist propaganda with an air of superiority?
Like at the least it could remain humble, and say something to the effect of āTo the best of my knowledge according to these sources listed, that I was able to determine in relation to your claim, it would appear your claim seems false from the apparent data. Do you have any other sources or data to provide that isnāt found listed here that I could use to understand more clearly?ā
This bot is neither right-wing nor left-wing. Its purpose is not to declare absolute truth, but simply to state what seems most likely based on various sources. As you can read in its description
But you're right, the bot is still under development and I'd like to make it more humble and pleasant.
We need a contrarian Fact checker bot. Because media and narrative in the west has been controlled by marxists for so long these AIās default to leftwing talking points on the Zero-shot. With some efforts and pointing out inconsistencies you can get them to give balanced and nuanced answers. The but unfortunately the default is leftist propaganda more often then not.