Here's another example. #nostr and other tools like it must succeed.
#[0]
TikTok To Censor Content That Challenges Global Warming Dogma https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/tiktok-censor-content-challenges-global-warming-dogma
Discussion
So sick of Twitter and other SM censoring this. I don't think it's a hoax or BS. I've got advanced science degrees and agree with the data we're accelerating it. But the data means nothing if you censor those who don't agree, because you've told them agree or be ostracized.
Right, if the data is as strong as advertised, let it be debated.
Greenland ice core data shows with high-resolution that earth’s climate naturally oscillates and what we’ve experienced since the Industrial Revolution is well within the normal atmospheric temperature range for the Holocene.
There are accurate records of atmospheric “warming” epochs with greater temperature rate-of-change during the Holocene and greater maximums as well.
Before the Holocene there were warming periods with rate-of-change at least an order of magnitude more severe. The earth’s climate didn’t spiral out of control. It oscillated back to a cooling epoch, as has been the case for hundreds of thousands of years.
Yes, human activity is contributing a small percentage to atmospheric co2. No, its not causing any climate outcomes that are out of the ordinary. These are the facts.
Good summary of the other side of the argument.