The main issue for me here is that all the problems are semi-expanded on first view. This means lots of scrolling. Plus like many users I'm accustomed to a list of issues that I can click into to comment, reference, etc.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Yeah what I think would be better is being able to filter problems and view them per-rocket, or view just a segment of the tree, etc.

The problem tracker in particular needs a lot of work, but I am horrible at UX and frontend stuff in general.

The way I look at UX is basically to copy the most popular things in use or that I use. A lot of research has been done and money is on the line for something like GitHub. I get the reimplementation here to integrate with merits and rockets but would probably just nudge toward the familiar. Filtering sounds good especially if it can persist past the # in the URL.

Yes absolutely agree.

UX is just a solution to a problem anyway.

I'm just not a frontend guy at all, the browser client is an afterthought for convenience (even though it's horrible, it's marginally better than nothing and makes my life easier).

I wouldn’t discount the opportunity to rethink things from first principles on nostr though.

Especially for the UX/UI of something like an unstoppable collaboration tool.

Copying something doesn’t make it an order of magnitude better (just because it’s on nostr now).