I’m working on a PoC for the HRF bounty about nostr group chat

NIP-44 ✅

NIP-112 🚧

The big missing part is these nips aren’t available in nostr browser extension

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Ok, NIP-44 isn't fully implemented, there is the NIP-65 thing missing.

Also, relay needs some modification to not send kind 44 to unauthorized user, but it's out of my scope.

Have you looked at vitor's nip 24? Very similar, but I think better executed. I put together a PoC of it here: https://inbox.coracle.social.

I'm also working on a comparison of all private messaging nips so that maybe we can all get on the same page and row together.

No, I’ll have a look at this NIP. Can you tell me what’s better according to you? Then I can agree or not later when I read it 😁

Just put together a (probably longer) summary here: https://gist.github.com/staab/f8284af12450dbbdcead6e0c3ed95e2c

TL;DR it double-wraps messages and leaves the inner one unsigned which increases metadata hiding. It also avoids key sharing (although key sharing could be added on top of it if desired).

Thank you for this!

Awesome thank you 🙏