That's rage bait. Gets more views if its intentionally angering.
Stated by who? Even the NYT used the term
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/29/opinion/stacey-abrams-georgia-governor-election-brian-kemp.html
I didn't bookmark stuff as I went, and many were interviews. I'll see what I can round up, but it's of no priority.
Discussion
So, if it sides with me, it's rage bait. If it sides with you, it's legit.
There does exist rage bait in the reverse if you want me to share links.
Couldn't care less. This is wokie behavior, dismissing things you don't like.
The New York times do no set immigration policy.
Never said it did, now did I?
This is the second time you've argued in bad faith.