Looking at Snort dms tonight, if you have any feedback, let me know! πββοΈ
Discussion
Would be nice to be able to set tae default zap amount?
Yeah I proposed this. Not sure of the status though.
Remove them. Put them on a separate app.
Why donβt it feel that way? Just want a dm-only client?
Do you * dang autocorrect
I agree! We could make more lightweight clients!
Less data, more speed.
Less features, the more developed they are.
Less features, less bugs.
Less features, easier to maintain.
E.g:
If you have a nostr messenger, you can add encrypted group messages to it as well later. Concentrate on only dm use cases.
I like the idea #[3] if you meant this.
Any possible way of improving nostr dm forward secrecy and/or way of encrypting who you are talking to?
IMHO, the current NIP-04 DM stuff should be killed with fire. The less integrated it is with other functionality, the better.
I'm a bit late to this note, but some ideas for snort DMs π‘
I'd look into splitting the DM screen into the following tabs; Inbox, Requests and Archived.
Inbox - DMs from anyone the user follows.
Requests - DMs from anyone the user does not follow.
Archive - User archived DMs.
I would also investigate a way to have DMing a user who you do not follow require a zap of some sort. The zap requirement for receiving DMs from non-followed users should be able to be set by the user.
As for the interface, something like this comes to mind:
CC: #[2]
