I really like interacting with Claude. I haven't necessarily explored too many other AI models but I like Claude.

I am orienting toward going on a pretty deep brainstorm session where I actually want to bring in a huge collection of my own personal brainstorm sessions and transcribe conversations with mentors and coaches etc. And I am starting to wonder about the potential privacy implications.

I like Claude but should I maybe consider going another more private route and would that be?

Though, I am already so deep in the conversation rabbit hole I am going down.

I kinda wish I had the tech knowlege and resources to go the train my own model route too.

#asknostr #ai

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Venice.ai!

I've used it a couple of times. Not sure why it's not so attractive to me but can test it out again.

I splurged and went on the pro version. I love being able to switch models and also being able to upload docs.

I also paid for a Claude and love I can upload stuff there. I will check it out. I can't believe I am feeling attached to an AI. oMFG.

Claude.ai and Venice.ai are both large language models developed by different companies. Here's a comparison based on publicly available information:

1. **Model Size and Training Data**: Claude.ai has a 1.5 billion parameter model, while Venice.ai has a 2.5 billion parameter model. Claude.ai was trained on a dataset of 1.5 terabytes, while Venice.ai's training dataset size is not publicly disclosed. Both models were trained using a combination of public and private datasets.

2. **Capabilities**: Claude.ai is known for its ability to generate long-form content and creative writing. Venice.ai, on the other hand, is more versatile and can handle a wide range of tasks, including generating text, answering questions, translating languages, and even creating art.

3. **User Interface**: Claude.ai provides a web-based interface for users, while Venice.ai is currently available as a browser extension and mobile app. Venice.ai also has a paid version, Venice Pro, which offers more customization options and higher limits for interactions with the AI models.

4. **Availability and Pricing**: Claude.ai is a commercial product with pricing based on usage, while Venice.ai offers a free version with limited usage and a paid version, Venice Pro, which requires holding 1 Morpheus (MOR) token to access.

5. **Tokenization**: Claude.ai uses a proprietary tokenization system, while Venice.ai uses a standard BPE (Byte Pair Encoding) tokenization.

6. **AI Model Updates**: Claude.ai has a dedicated team that constantly updates and refines the model, while Venice.ai updates its model periodically through its open-source community.

7. **Support and Community**: Claude.ai has a larger user base and community, with more resources available for troubleshooting and learning. Venice.ai, being a newer platform, has a smaller but growing community.

Ultimately, the choice between Claude.ai and Venice.ai depends on your specific needs and preferences. Both models have their strengths and weaknesses, and it's recommended to try them out and see which one works best for you.

Because it is not trained with the woke Big AI is why I love it.

How is it trained?

It was trained on all the Health ranger work, Pubmed, and Dr. mercola's very extensive library. It runs off line and should the internet be down it is basicly like your own doctor.

Ah I got you. You are not talking about Venice Ai but health rangers ai you mentioned here earlier. I got mixed up a bit. I have not check that out yet.

I really love the Health Ranger's AI. He has trained his on Dr Mercola's stuff! What a gem. Very helpful!

Yeah I've got a sinking feeling that all the input I give it will be used against me- advertising or worse