Can we rather bring up again the discussion on why we cannot change at consensus level?
Not saying I want this, but it seems like the conversation at meme policy got to a stall and it’s not useful anymore, maybe talking about at consensus level at least might be more productive
We have been telling these retarded clowns that for two years. Instead they'd rather be toxic deceptive shitbags misleading people.
They have seriously done more damage misleading people and undermining Bitcoiners understanding of Bitcoin in the last two years than Bcashers have done in the last 10.
As a new Bitcoiner I was indeed confused at first, but this debate gave me the opportunity to dig deeper into the nuances and further my understanding a lot!
In the end I agree with your position dude: a system that is truly censorship resistance for every use, and the market players ultimately decides what is most valuable. The best defense is to be as open as possible
Love the perspectives you bring man, cheers
When you have to turn to name calling, you're arguments are probably lacking the quality needed to change minds.
A soft fork limiting the size of a transaction has recently been discussed: https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/non-confiscatory-transaction-weight-limit/1732
