i can’t believe i’m agreeing with pmarca https://www.wsj.com/articles/should-ai-be-open-source-behind-the-tweetstorm-over-its-dangers-65aa5c97
Discussion
open it up, it's the only way!
Open source is the best way. The real question is how many people in the world are willing and able to work with it?
Why does that question matter? The number won't be fewer if it's open. It's going to at least be the same and probably more if it's open. No relevance.
Yes, it is relevant. It’s a resource for working on A.I.
Not in this context anyway.
Do you know how many people are specialist on this area?
Should absolutely be open source.
I agree Jack.
The argument against openness is that China might steal the technology... when they already have. Now only a corporation and a hostile state actor posess the know-how.
at the end everything is gonna be open source…
Why do you even read that rag?
It should be whatever each creator licenses it as. I want Foss AI to exist, but not if it's stolen.
Especially when it's Vinod on the other side
Reserving that kind of potential knowledge in the hands of a select few in a type of arms race vs. a more distributed & balanced knowledge base for everyone.
It's always a difficult choice, but the latter seems more prudent in the long term.
Anthropic is also doing good models nowadays..
Looks like everyone wants the ring!
The problem with the ring is, it spits out wrong health info. It is going to hurt humans not in robot form but in disinformation of health related topics form. The robot is a fantasy, a distraction.
People will think "awww this thing knows everything". Let me ask another question to it: "Should I jab myself?"
Jack forehead coming soon protect your business personal loss by the big guys - !! 6 billion you covered——
Absolutely 💯 !! It must be open.
Banning things is a very old school way of addressing the things that scare us in the world. We have plenty of data now to support how freaking devastating ban hammering stuff because of “what ifs” can be.
He might unblock you now :)
I didn't know Khosla was early OpenAI backer - big returns
While this may not be relevant to the discussion, I don’t think the Manhattan project is a great analogy. The US is the only country that killed hundreds of thousands of innocent lives with nuclear weapons.
During WW2, while Russia was busy fighting against the Nazi, the US was focused on building their atomic weapons.
After WW2 ended, and many years after Pearl Harbour, and way after Hitler committed suicide, and months after that last battle of Okinawa, only then US decided to show its global dominant power by blasting Japan.
Why?
Who knows. But a couple of months before that, they pitched the Bretton Woods agreement and needed the world to sign on.
Russia picked up pace on nuclear weapons after WW2 and it's at par. The world has not been at peace because of global dominance over nuclear weapons, nor have they really put nuclear energy into good use for the people.
Having a select few make decisions for the world because they have monetary interest has never been a good idea. The Manhattan project will tell you that.
#factcheck You may want to research Battle of the Bulge
companies evolve so does the mission. same happened with "twitter". they should change their name and elon will drop the claim, hopefully
AI needs BTC! Check my thought! Loved to see you live in Madeira!! Hope you had a nice time over there!!
"Even a stopped clock". And there's nothing *forcing* him to make poor choices.
slowly but surely making progress. 🤘🏻 "bird by bird, buddy. bird by bird". no other way to do it other than by hand.
