I would argue that if you are running a censorship resistant platform, then you are doing censorship resistance wrong.
Never write freedom tech that puts yourself or anyone else in a privileged role in the network.
I would argue that if you are running a censorship resistant platform, then you are doing censorship resistance wrong.
Never write freedom tech that puts yourself or anyone else in a privileged role in the network.
this doesn't apply to running a relay
really it is about the client, i think?
there is no network if you let spammers determine the LCD of the equation
It depends. Relays are the Achilles' heel of nostr. They store and forward, often unencrypted, data. That makes them a target for censorship. It is a difficult, shifting target, but it does give governments someone to punish.
They can target authors of client software as well, but that doesn't stop the software from proliferating.
“Governments are good at cutting off the heads of a centrally controlled networks like Napster, but pure P2P networks like Gnutella and Tor seem to be holding their own.”